Elsevier

Journal of Rural Studies

Volume 68, May 2019, Pages 182-190
Journal of Rural Studies

The participatory construction of new economic models in short food supply chains

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.019Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Short food supply chains are economic organisations designed by social interactions.

  • The construction of new economic models is made of negotiations and compromises.

  • Different ways to organise a new food economy can be described through common criteria.

  • New economic models rely on trust, transparency, mutual acknowledgment and learning.

  • Participation of specialists and non-specialists favours new economic models.

Abstract

While a number of works question the alterity of alternative food chains, little has been said about the social processes under which new economic models are, or may be, developed within the broader movement around ‘short food supply chains’ (SFCs) in Europe. Considering SFCs as economic organisations, we propose an analytical framework based on New Economic Sociology and Convention Theory, enriched by Social and Solidarity Economics, to capture the social construction of new economic models in such chains. We apply this framework to two case studies: an open-air market promoting short food supply chains in France, and a partnership between an agricultural cooperative and several solidarity purchase groups (GAS) in Italy. Analysing the trajectories of the two initiatives, we highlight the processes through which new economic models are jointly built via interactions between different actors. Our results open two lines of discussion: one concerning the ‘new economic models' that emerge from the two cases, a second regarding the actors' participation in elaborating and enacting these new models.

Introduction

Over the last few decades in Europe, the food sector has witnessed a profusion of initiatives bringing producers and consumers close (or closer). From ‘alternative food networks' (or systems) contesting the mainstream agro-industrial model (Renting et al., 2003) to traditional ‘short food supply chains' experiencing a revival in Europe (Kneafsey, 2015; Chiffoleau, 2017), all of these initiatives, regardless of their origin or initial intention, present a common point: a ‘promise of difference’, compared to long supply chains. That is ‘a promise of another mode of organising production, exchanges and/or food consumption, and the promise of associated benefits' (Le Velly, 2017). The general organisation of alternative or short food systems has thus been extensively described (Deverre and Lamine, 2010), feeding a debate about their ‘alterity’ (Holloway et al., 2007; Constance et al., 2014). These works, nevertheless, say little about the social processes which have built their alterity, whether ‘strong’ or ‘weak’. Little is said about the tensions that may have emerged, the compromises that have been made during this construction, especially with regards to the economic dimension. This longitudinal approach, which is attentive to the social processes underlying the economic dimension, proves useful, not only to better understand the emergence of ‘hybrid’ food systems, which combine alternative and conventional attributes (Le Velly and Dufeu, 2016), but also to explore the transformative potential of a diversity of short food supply chains, beyond those classified as alternative (Kneafsey, 2015).

In this paper, we propose to analyse the social construction of ‘new’ economic patterns which differ from the mainstream model in two cases of market initiatives based on close relations between producers and consumers: an open-air market in France, and a partnership between a cooperative and several GAS (Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale - solidarity-based purchase groups1) in Italy. We use here the notion ‘short food supply chain’ (SFC) to address these two initiatives as well as all the ‘alternative’ food systems (or networks) mentioned in the literature, as the common feature they all share is that they reduce the number of intermediaries between producer and consumer even though their alterity may be discussed. Then, considering SFCs as economic organisations, we use the two cases to highlight how, and under which conditions, they evolve as social spaces where new economic models are discussed and jointly created over time, addressing new indicators of wealth (Gadrey and Jany-Catrice, 2006) beyond mere turnover. The original aspect of our contribution is thus to explore some of the paths through which ‘another economy’ (Laville and Cattani, 2005) is being built in short food supply chains, as well as to propose criteria on which ‘new economic models’ can be analysed and assessed in, and from, these chains. Moreover, by showing how these economic models are fuelled by and dependent on the interactions between ‘skilled’ and ‘unskilled’ actors, our work opens new perspectives for food democracy. This notion, which appeared at the end of the 1990s, refers in broad strokes to a condition in which citizens regain control over their food and their food systems (Lang, 1998). Whether considered from a regulatory perspective (ibid.), or in concrete local situations (Hassanein, 2003), food democracy refers to the capacity of citizens to take part in the decision-making about food production and consumption practices. Nevertheless, the way this participation can be expanded beyond ‘enlightened’ citizens and build new economic patterns still needs to be explored (Booth and Coveney, 2015).

In the first section, we briefly go back to previous works on the economic dimension of alternative food networks, local or short food supply chains, to stress how this dimension has been analysed and to position our own contribution. In the second section, we introduce our framework of analysis, combining contributions from sociology and economics. In the third section, we present the trajectories of two SFCs as economic organisations confronted with challenges and designed by social interactions. In the fourth section, by comparing the two cases, we open two lines of discussion: the first one about the ‘new’ economic models that are set up through the two initiatives; the second about the nature and the role of participation in the construction of new economic patterns.

Section snippets

The economic dimension of SFCs as described in the literature: a review

Studying the economic dimension of SFCs is not an easy task since markets are conceived as complex social spaces in which different actors interact and may jointly define essential issues regarding the process of selling and buying (White, 1981). In the food sector this conception results in the active construction of networks by various actors of the agrofood chain, such as farmers, food processors, wholesalers, retailers, and consumers (Renting et al., 2003). Over the last few years,

SFCs as economic organisations: a combination of lines of research

Although recent works on SFCs both address the interplay between the economic and the social aspects, and economic issues, more attention must be paid to their social construction, especially regarding the economic dimension. SFCs must be further analysed as economic organisations in which basic economic features such as prices, margins, governance structure, etc. are defined and negotiated throughout their trajectory. To capture their potential as ‘new’ economic models, new criteria must also

Renewing the traditional open-air market economic pattern: the Grabels market case

‘Grabels market’ is an open-air market created in 2008 in the small town of Grabels (7000 inhabitants) located in the suburbs of the city of Montpellier (500,000 inhabitants) in the south of France. By implementing a market in Grabels, the newly elected local authorities (municipality) aimed at reviving its dormant peri-urban town, giving middle to low-income inhabitants the opportunity to obtain fresher and better products at reasonable prices, while supporting local small-scale sustainable

Towards a ‘moral economy’?

The comparison of the two stories shows how the development of new economic patterns is embedded in social relations, which provide – in both cases – the ground for trust, transparency, mutual acknowledgment and learning. These latter aspects reflect social ends that are (or become) important for the actors, while at the same time enacting the principle of new economic models that address new indicators of wealth, and designing new types of ‘market relations’ between farmers, consumers and

Conclusion

The economic dimension of SFCs, within a European context marked by a profusion of initiatives aimed at bringing producers and consumers closer, still feeds a debate focused on its alterity (Le Velly, 2017), leaving its social construction under-researched. From an original framework, based on New Economic Sociology and Convention Theory, enriched as well by Social and Solidarity Economics, we have analysed the social construction of two ‘alternative’ economic models in two cases of SFCs. We

References (71)

  • G. Berti et al.

    Competitiveness of small farms and innovative food supply chains: the role of food hubs in creating sustainable regional and local food systems

    Sustainability

    (2016)
  • A. Blay-Palmer et al.

    A tale of three tomatoes. The new food economy in Toronto, Canada

    Econ. Geogr.

    (2006)
  • F.L. Block

    Postindustrial Possibilities: a Critique of Economic Discourse

    (1990)
  • J.D. Bloom et al.

    Informal and formal mechanisms of coordination in hybrid food value chains

    Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development

    (2016)
  • L. Boltanski et al.

    De la justification

    (1991)
  • S. Booth et al.

    Food Democracy: from Consumer to Food Citizen

    (2015)
  • G. Brunori et al.

    Co-producing transition: innovation processes in farms adhering to solidarity-based purchase groups (Gas) in Tuscany

    Italy. Int. J. Sociol. Agric. Food

    (2011)
  • D. Constance et al.

    Alternative agrifood movements: patterns of convergence and divergence

    Res. Rural Sociol. Dev.

    (2014)
  • D. Capt et al.

    Determinants of direct-to-consumer sales on French farms

    Revue d’Études en Agriculture et Environnement

    (2014)
  • M.-E. Chessel

    Histoire de la consommation

    (2012)
  • Y. Chiffoleau

    From politics to cooperation: the dynamics of embeddedness in alternative food supply chains

    Sociol. Rural.

    (2009)
  • Y. Chiffoleau

    Dynamique des identités collectives dans le changement d’échelle des circuits courts alimentaires

    Revue française de socio-économie

    (2017)
  • R.H. Coase

    The nature of the firm

    Economica

    (1937)
  • S. Connelly et al.

    Bridging sustainability and the social economy: achieving community transformation through local food initiatives

    Crit. Soc. Policy

    (2016)
  • D.S. Conner et al.

    Value chains for sustainable procurement in large school districts: fostering partnerships

    Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development

    (2011)
  • C. Deverre et al.

    Les systèmes agroalimentaires alternatifs. Une revue de travaux anglophones en sciences sociales

    Écon. Rurale

    (2010)
  • E. Dowler et al.

    Thinking about 'food security': engaging with UK consumers

    Crit. Public Health

    (2011)
  • F. Eymard-Duvernay

    Conventionalist approaches to enterprise

  • F. Eymard-Duvernay et al.

    Pluralist integration in the economic and social sciences: the economy of conventions

    Post-autistic economics review

    (2005)
  • O. Favereau et al.

    Conventions and Structures in Economic Organization. Markets, Networks and Hierarchy

    (2002)
  • P. Fleury et al.

    Developing mid-tier supply chains (France) and values-based food supply chains (USA): a comparison of motivations, achievements, barriers and limitations

    Agriculture

    (2016)
  • E. Friedberg

    Power and Rules: the Organisational Dynamics of Collective Action

    (1996)
  • J. Gadrey et al.

    The New Indicators of Well-Being and Development

    (2006)
  • R.E. Galt

    The moral economy is a double-edged sword: explaining farmers' earnings and self-exploitation in community-supported agriculture

    Econ. Geogr.

    (2013)
  • D. Goodman et al.

    Alternative Food Networks. Knowledge, Practice, and Politics

    (2012)
  • Cited by (60)

    • Building cleaner production: How to anchor sustainability in the food production chain?

      2022, Environmental Advances
      Citation Excerpt :

      The main objective of these analyses, applied to the food production chain, is to find ways to reduce environmental and economic impacts, through post-harvest loss reduction rates and/or processing and reuse of waste, highlighting its potential for optimizing processes under the concept of a circular economy (Philippidis et al., 2019; Kharola et al., 2022; Schmidt and Moreno, 2022). However, the economic dimension is not an easy task, as markets are conceived as complex social spaces in which different actors interact and can jointly define essential questions about the buying and selling process (Chiffoleau et al., 2019). To this end, governance measures end up intertwining like threads that communicate inseparably, resulting in complex sustainability.

    • How alternative foods become affordable: The co-construction of economic value on a direct-to-customer market

      2022, Journal of Rural Studies
      Citation Excerpt :

      A further study argues that the origins of different foods influence how customers value them, which has a bearing on how customers perceive their economic value (Meah and Watson, 2013). In addition, extant studies of economic valuation in alternative food networks suggest new economic models that facilitate trust and transparency in markets, such as customers trusting suppliers to set fair and reasonable prices, are essential for such networks (Chiffoleau et al., 2019; Thorsøe and Kjeldsen, 2016; see also Le Velly and Dufeu, 2016). It is, moreover, well established that people's engagement with sustainable consumption increases with their disposable income, but not in a clear-cut or linear manner (cf. e.g. Annunziata et al., 2019; Plessz et al., 2016).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text