Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conflict management and innovation performance: An integrated contingency perspective

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, many of the basic assumptions underlying organizational conflict research have changed, drawing into question the validity of some previous research findings. Operating from the perspective that conflict is complex, multidimensional, and context specific, this research takes a fresh look at key conflict antecedents, mediators, and consequences in the context of the innovation process. The study investigates the relationships among five behavioral conflict-handling strategies, destructive and constructive conflict, and innovation performance as perceived by 290 R & D and marketing department managers. Empirical results both support and question some of the previous findings in conflict research. The results indicate that integrating, accommodating, compromising, forcing, and avoiding conflict-handling strategies can have different impacts on constructive and destructive conflict in an innovation context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, Jennifer L. and Durairaj Maheswaran. 1997. “The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion.”Journal of Consumer Research 24 (4): 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Patti Williams. 1998. “Empathy Versus Pride: The Influence of Emotional Appeals Across Cultures.”Journal of Consumer Re-search 25 (3): 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achrol, Ravi S. 1997. “Changes in the Theory of Interorganizational Relations in Marketing: Toward a Network Paradigm.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 (1): 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, Leona S. and Stephen G. West. 1991.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Erin and Barton Weitz. 1992. “The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels.”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (February): 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anterasian, Cathy, John L. Graham, and R. Bruce Money. 1996. “Are U.S. Managers Superstitious About Market Share?”Sloan Management Review 37 (Summer): 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, Richard P. 1995. “Reflections on Relationship Marketing in Consumer Markets.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (4): 272–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M. and J. Child. 1996. “From Fiefs to Clans and Network Capitalism: Explaining China’s Emerging Economic Order.”Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (4): 600–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Nigel C. G. 1986. “Buyer/Seller Relationships in Japan and Germany: An Interaction Approach.”European Journal of Marketing 19 (3): 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, Joseph, P. and William D. Perreault, Jr. 1999. “Buyer-Seller Relationships in Business Markets.”Journal of Marketing Research 36 (November): 439–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Terry. 1990. “International Marketing and National Character: A Review and Proposal for a Research Agenda.”Journal of Marketing 53 (1): 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dastmalchian, Ali, Sangho Lee, and Ignace Ng. 2000. “The Interplay Between Organizational and National Cultures: A Comparison of Organizational Practices in Canada and South Korea Using the Competing Values Framework.”International Journal of Human Resource Management 11 (2): 388–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. 1978.The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpandé, Rohit and John U. Farley. 2004. “Organizational Culture, Market Orientation, Innovativeness, and Firm Performance: An International Research Odyssey.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 21 (March): 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, and Frederick E. Webster, Jr. 1993. “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 57 (1): 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, and — 1997. “Factors Affecting Organizational Performance: A Five-country Comparison.” Report No. 97-108. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, and —. 2000. “Triad Lessons: Generalizing Results on High Performance Firms in Five Business-to-Business Markets.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 17 (4): 353–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doney, Patricia M. and Joseph P. Cannon. 1997. “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 61 (2): 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Jeffery H. and W. G. Ouchi. 1993. “Japanese-Style Partnerships: Giving Companies a Competitive Edge.”Sloan Management Review 35 (1): 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, Mike Albert Caruana and George M. Zinkhan. 2002. “On the Cross-National Generalisability and Equivalence of Advertising Response Scales Developed in the USA.”International Journal of Advertising 21 (3): 323–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganesan, Shankar. 1994. “Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 58 (2): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, Rajdeep and Patriya Tansuhaj. 2001. “Building Organizational Capabilities for Managing Economic Crisis: The Role of Market Orientation and Strategic Flexibility.”Journal of Marketing 65 (2): 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronroos, Christian. 1994. “From Marketing Mix to Relationship Marketing: Towards a Paradigm Shift in Marketing.”Management Decision 32 (2): 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, Jan B. and George John. 1990. “Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships?”Journal of Marketing 56 (2): 32–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersche, Joel and Brian Engelland. 1996. “Reversed-Polarity Items and Scale Unidimensionality.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 24 (Fall): 366–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewett, Kelly and William O. Bearden. 2001. “Dependence, Trust, and Relational Behavior on the Part of Foreign Subsidiary Marketing Operations: Implications for Managing Global Marketing Operations.”Journal of Marketing 65 (October): 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, R. Bruce Money, and Subhash Sharma. 2002. “An Exploration of the Moderating Role of Corporate Culture in Industrial Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30 (3): 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, Geert. 1980.Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991.Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, Geert. 1994. Values Survey Module 1994 Manual. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Institute for Research on Intercultural Cooperation, University of Limburg.

  • —. 2001.Culture’s Consequence (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Michael Harris Bond. 1988. “The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth.”Organizational Dynamics 16 (Spring): 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayachandran, Satish, Kelly Hewett, and Peter Kaufman. 2004. “Customer Response Capability in a Sense-and-Respond Era: The Role of Customer Knowledge Process.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 32 (3): 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Just Good Friends.” 1994.The Economist December 17:19.

  • Kitchell, Susan. 1995. “Corporate Culture, Environmental Adaptation, and Innovative Adoption: A Qualitative/Quantitative Approach.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (3): 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, Richard, Ed. 1962.Culture and Behavior: Collected Essays of Clyde Kluckhohn. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce and Harbir Singh. 1988. “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode.”Journal of International Business Studies 19 (3): 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, Alfred L. and Clyde Kluckhohn. 1952. “Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts & Definitions.” InPapers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology & Ethnology, Vol. 47, No. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, Nirmalya, Lisa K. Scheer, and Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp. 1995. “The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes.”Journal of Marketing Research 32 (3): 348–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, Mike, George M. Zinkhan, and Judy Harris 1993. “Consumer Tipping: A Cross-Country Study.”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (December): 478–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, Michael. 2004. “Our Hidden Savings.”BusinessWeek January 17:34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G. and Herbert A. Simon. 1958.Organizations. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Charlotte and William D. Perreault. 1991. “Collinearity, Power, and Interpretation of Multiple Regression Analysis.”Journal of Marketing Research 28 (August): 268–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, Jakki J., Robert J. Fisher, and John R. Nevin. 1996. “Collaborative Communication in Interfirm Relationships: Moderating Effects of Integration and Control.”Journal of Marketing 60 (October): 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Money, R. Bruce, Mary C. Gilly, and John L. Graham. 1998. “Explorations of National Culture & Word: Mouth Referral Behavior in the Purchase of Industrial Services in the U.S. & Japan.”Journal of Marketing 62 (October): 76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, Christine. 1995. “Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes.”Journal of Marketing Research 32 (3): 318–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1994. “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 58 (October): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, Cheryl and K. Sivakumar. 1996. “National Culture and New Product Development: An Integrative Review.”Journal of Marketing 60 (January): 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 2001. “Instituting the Marketing Concept in a Multinational Setting: The Role of National Culture.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29 (3): 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Karen L. and Stanley D. Nollen. 1996. “Culture and Congruence: The Fit Between Management Practices and National Culture.”Journal of International Business Studies 27 (4): 753–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norburn, David, Sue Birley, Mark Dunn, and Adrian Payne. 1990. “A Four Nation Study of the Relationship Between Marketing Effectiveness, Corporate Culture, Corporate Values and Market Orientation.”Journal of International Business Studies 21 (3): 451–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norvell, Wayne, David M. Andrus, and Valerie Layman. 1996. “The Impact of International Marketing Decisions on the Environment: A Comparative Study of U.S. & Colombian Firms.”Multinational Business Review Spring: 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, Kenichi. 1985.Triad Power: The Coming Shape of Global Competition. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, William. 1980. “Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans.”Administrative Science Quarterly 25 (2): 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pe≈naloza, Lisa. 1994. “Atravensando Fronteras/Border Crossings: A Critical Ethnographic Exploration of the Consumer Acculturation of Mexican Immigrants.”Journal of Consumer Research 21 (June): 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pothukuchi, Vijay, Fariborz Damanpour, Jaepil Choi, Chao C. Chen, and Seung Ho Park. 2002. “National and Organizational Culture Differences and International Joint Venture Performance.”Journal of International Business Studies 33 (2): 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, Andrew D. and Habte G. Selassie. 2003. “Are Cultural Differences Overrated? Examining the Influence of National Culture on International Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Consumer Behaviour 2 (4): 354–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puan, Dorothy A. 1997. “A Study of ‘Best’ Versus ‘Average’ Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Business Research 39 (May): 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Robert E. 1988.Beyond Rational Management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, Martin S. 1995. “The Effects of Culture and Socioeconomics on the Performance of Global Brand Image Strategies.”Journal of Marketing Research 32 (2): 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selenes, Fred, Bernard J. Jaworski, and Ajay K. Kohli. 1997. “Market Orientation in U.S. & Scandinavian Companies: A Cross-Cultural Study.” Report No. 97-107. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, Paul E., Cary L. Cooper, and Kate Sparks. 2001. “An International Study of the Psychometric Properties of the Hofstede Values Survey Module of 1994: A Comparison of Individual and Country/Province Level Results.”Applied Psychology: An International Review 50 (2): 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M and Hans Baumgartner. 1998. “Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 25 (3): 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Frenkel ter Hofstede, and Michel Wedel. 1999. “A Cross-National Investigation Into the Individual and National Cultural Antecedents of Consumer Innovativeness.”Journal of Marketing 63 (April): 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Jeremiah and Richard B. Peterson. 1988. “Factors Associated With Trust in Japanese-American Joint Ventures.”International Management Review 22 (2): 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takada, Hirokazu, and Dipak Jain. 1991. “Cross-National Analysis of Diffusion of Consumer Durable Goods in Pacific Rim Countries.”Journal of Marketing 55 (April): 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayeb, Monir. 1994. “Organizations and National Culture: Methodology Considered.”Organization Studies 15 (3): 429–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, Harry C. and Michele J. Gelfand. 1998. “Converging Measurement of Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (1): 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, David K., Kam-hon Lee, Ilan Vertinsky, and Donald A. Wehrung. 1988. “Does Culture Matter? A Cross-Cultural Study of Executives’ Choice, Decisiveness, and Risk Adjustment in International Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 52 (October): 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Y., Oded Shenkar, and A. Raveh. 1996. “National and Corporate Cultural Fit in Mergers/Acquisitions: An Exploratory Study.”Management Science 42 (August): 1215–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wind, Yoram. 1970. “Industrial Source Loyalty.”Journal of Marketing Research 1 (4): 450–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Nancy, Aric Rindfleisch, and James E. Burroughs. 2003. “Do Reverse-Worded Items Confound Measures in Cross-Cultural Consumer Research? The Case of the Material Values Scale.”Journal of Consumer Research 30 (June): 72–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yip, G., Johny K. Johansson, and Johan Roos. 1996. “Effects of Nationality on Global Strategy in Major American, European, and Japanese Multinational Companies.” Report No. 96-126. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, George M. and Penelope J. Prenshaw. 1994. “Good Life Images and Brand Name Associations: Evidence From Asia, America, and Europe.” InAdvances in Consumer Research, Vol. 21. Eds. C. Allen and D. Roedder John. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research 496–500.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Kelly Hewett (kelly_hewett@moore.sc.edu) is in the Department of Marketing at the Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina. Her research focuses on the management of relationships between buyers and sellers, as well as between headquarters and foreign subsidiaries in managing the marketing function globally. Her research has been published in theJournal of Marketing, the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, and theJournal of International Business Studies, among others.

R. Bruce Money (moneyb@byu.edu) is the Donald Staheli Fellow and an associate professor of marketing and international business in the Marriott School of Management, Brigham Young University. His articles have been published in journals such as theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of International Business Studies, andSloan Management Review. His research interests include the international aspects of national culture’s measurement and effects, business-to-business marketing, word-of-mouth promo-tion, services marketing, and negotiation.

Subhash Sharma (sharma@moore.sc.edu) is the James F. Kane Professor of Business in the Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina. Professor Sharma’s research interests include marketing strategy, structural equation modeling, data mining, customer relationship management, e-commerce, the marketing-operations interface, and global marketing strategies. He has published numerous articles in these areas in leading academic journals such as theJournal of Marketing Research, theJournal of Marketing, Marketing Science, theJournal of Retailing, theJournal of Operations Management, theInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, andManagement Science. Professor Sharma has also authored two textbooks:Applied Multivariate Techniques (John Wiley, 1996) andScaling Procedures: Issues and Applications (with Richard G. Netemeyer and William O. Bearden, Sage, 2003). Professor Sharma was a member of the editorial boards of theJournal of Marketing Research and theJournal of Marketing and currently serves on the editorial review board of theJournal of Retailing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, M., Dyer, B. & Thieme, R.J. Conflict management and innovation performance: An integrated contingency perspective. JAMS 34, 341–356 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070306286705

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070306286705

Keywords

Navigation